Climate Diplomacy as a Foreign Policy Tool: Pakistan's Role in Regional Water Politics and Transboundary Environmental Governance

Authors

  • Muhammad Naeem Department of Pakistan Studies and International Relations, Abbottabad University of Science and Technology, Abbottabad, 22620, Pakistan.
  • Imran Naseem * Department of Pakistan Studies and International Relations, Abbottabad University of Science and Technology, Abbottabad, 22620, Pakistan. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7549-3952

https://doi.org/10.48313/iee.vi.74

Abstract

Climate change has intensified transboundary water insecurity in South Asia, where shared river systems are increasingly shaped by geopolitical tensions and institutional fragility. This study examines how climate diplomacy, regional water agreements, institutional coordination, and environmental dispute resolution mechanisms influence transboundary environmental governance, with Pakistan as the empirical focus. Based on survey data from 137 policymakers, environmental experts, policy analysts, and academics, the quantitative results show that climate diplomacy, institutional coordination, and environmental dispute resolution mechanisms significantly enhance governance effectiveness, with conflict resolution emerging as the strongest determinant. In contrast, regional water agreements exhibit a positive but statistically insignificant effect, indicating weaknesses in treaty implementation and enforcement. The findings further reveal that Pakistan’s diplomatic engagement capacity significantly mediates these relationships, while geopolitical tensions in South Asia significantly moderate them, constraining cooperative governance outcomes despite formal institutional frameworks. Overall, the study underscores that effective transboundary water governance depends not only on formal agreements but more critically on diplomatic capacity, institutional integration, and robust conflict resolution mechanisms in a politically contested regional environment.

Keywords:

Climate diplomacy, Transboundary water governance, Institutional coordination, Environmental conflict resolution, Diplomatic capacity, South Asia geopolitics

References

  1. [1] Arfanuzzaman, M. (2025). Transboundary water cooperation and joint river basin management are pivotal for climate resilient development in South Asia. World Development Perspectives, 38, 100681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2025.100681
  2. [2] Eitan, A. (2026). Privatizing environmental governance: the evolving relationship between regulators and private entities. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 28(3), 448–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2025.2576781
  3. [3] Scheffran, J. (2023). Limits to the Anthropocene: geopolitical conflict or cooperative governance? Frontiers in Political Science, 5, 1190610. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2023.1190610
  4. [4] Kinne, B. J. (2024). Network context and the effectiveness of international agreements. International Studies Quarterly, 68(3), sqae099. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqae099
  5. [5] Alam, A., Khan, S., Muhib, K., & Khalil, M. N. (2024). Climate diplomacy: Unlocking international cooperation for a sustainable future. Social Sciences Spectrum, 3(4), 397–410. https://doi.org/10.71085/sss.03.04.184
  6. [6] Dar, S. B. (2023). Climate change mitigation and environmental governance: Maritime and air pollution perspectives highlighting china’s initiatives. Pakistan Jl Analysis & Wisdom, 2, 45. https://doi.org/10.1234/pjlaw.v2i02.49
  7. [7] Malik, A., Mohsin, S., & others. (2024). An Analysis of India Pakistan Water Conflicts. Journal of Politics and International Studies, 10(1), 175–188. https://jpis.pu.edu.pk/45/article/view/1366
  8. [8] Nazli, S., Liu, J., Wang, H., & Soomro, S. (2024). Water resources in Pakistan: a comprehensive overview and management challenges. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 15(10), 4919–4935. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2024.415
  9. [9] Mansur, T. M., & Hann, T. R. (2026). The existence of customary forests within the context of the mukim customary law in Aceh, Indonesia: contemporary perspectives and future challenges on climate change. SN Social Sciences, 6(3), 89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-026-01371-2
  10. [10] Wirsing, R. G., & Jasparro, C. (2007). River rivalry: Water disputes, resource insecurity and diplomatic deadlock in South Asia. Water Policy, 9(3), 231–251. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2007.014
  11. [11] Syed, F. Z., Awan, M. W., & Mumtaz, T. (2024). Environmental governance and policy implementation in Pakistan: Assessing Institutional capacities and challenges. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 5(2), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2024(5-II-S)40
  12. [12] Ahmad, S., Jia, H., Ashraf, A., Yin, D., Chen, Z., Xu, C., ... & Ahmed, R. (2023). Water resources and their management in Pakistan: A critical analysis on challenges and implications. Water-Energy Nexus, 6, 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wen.2023.10.001
  13. [13] Agrawal, A., Brandhorst, S., Jain, M., Liao, C., Pradhan, N., & Solomon, D. (2022). From environmental governance to governance for sustainability. One Earth, 5(6), 615–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.05.014
  14. [14] Hafezi, R., & Wood, D. A. (2026). Reframing climate diplomacy: power asymmetries, civil society, and the limits of multilateral environmental agreements. Frontiers in Political Science, 8, 1665610. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2026.1665610
  15. [15] Sebastiao, S. P., & Soares, I. (2023). Environmental diplomacy: From transnational policies to the role of ambassadors-the contribution of David Attenborough (2018-2020). Journal of Communication Management, 27(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-04-2022-0030
  16. [16] Khan, M. N., & Hamza, A. (2026). Climate Change and Water Belligerence Nexus: India and Pakistan’s Water Crisis. Global Nexus Handbook, 2, 749–768. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394248087.ch41
  17. [17] Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony (Vol. 54). Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://pages.ucsd.edu/~bslantchev/courses/ps240/05%20Cooperation%20with%20States%20as%20Unitary%20Actors/Keohane%20-%20After%20Hegemony%20[Ch%204-6].pdf
  18. [18] Burke, A. (2022). An architecture for a net zero world: Global climate governance beyond the epoch of failure. Global Policy, 13, 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13159
  19. [19] Kumar, S. (2024). Regional organizations and States in international Relations: A study of India’s approach towards regional organizations. Millennial Asia, 15(2), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/09763996221105148
  20. [20] Gleick, P. H. (1993). Water and conflict: Fresh water resources and international security. International Security, 18(1), 79–112. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539033
  21. [21] Salman, S. M. A., & Uprety, K. (2021). Conflict and cooperation on South Asia’s international rivers: A legal perspective (Vol. 8). BRILL. https://brill.com/display/title/10960
  22. [22] Warner, J. (2008). Contested Hydrohegemony: Hydraulic Control and Security in Turkey. Water Alternatives, 1(2), 271. https://www.academia.edu/download/8567125/Art1-2-6.pdf
  23. [23] Qureshi, A., & Naseem, I. (2026). Pakistan’s role in the environmental diplomacy: An appraisal. Social Science Review Archives, 4(1), 4991–5004. https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v4i1.2207
  24. [24] Hossain, M. N., & Mumu, U. H. (2026). Evaluating climate adaptation governance in south Asia: A comparative assessment of policies, institutions, and regional cooperation. Environmental Management, 76(5), 152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-026-02451-y
  25. [25] Brunet-Jailly, E. (2022). Cross-border cooperation: A global overview. Alternatives, 47(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754211073463
  26. [26] Khan, A. R., Nizam, S., & Hanif, S. (2026). Climate politics, institutional fragmentation, and development planning in Pakistan: Assessing policy coherence for sustainable development. Global Political Review, 11(2), 11–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2026(XI-II).02
  27. [27] Bose, S. K. (2026). Environmental federalism and multi-level governance coordination in Southeast Asia: A comparative empirical analysis of five ASEAN economies. International Journal of Business and Management (IJBM), 5(1), 1170–1186. https://doi.org/10.56879/ijbm.v5i1.61
  28. [28] Prniyazova, A., Turaeva, S., Turgunov, D., & Jarihani, B. (2025). Sustainable transboundary water governance in Central Asia: Challenges, conflicts, and regional cooperation. Sustainability, 17(11), 4968. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114968
  29. [29] Ahmed, S., Muhammad, G., & Chandio, S. (2026). Water diplomacy in South Asia: Pakistan’s strategies and regional implications. ASSAJ, 5(01), 3177–3187. https://assajournal.com/index.php/36/article/view/1677
  30. [30] Zawahri, N., Schmeier, S., & McCracken, M. (2025). The effectiveness of joint basin institutions in managing international water disputes. Environment and Security, 3(4), 482–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/27538796251347886
  31. [31] Sullivan, F. M. (2026). Peacebuilding through water cooperation? Institutional design and peace-relevant functions in the Indus and Nile Basins. Hidrológiai Közlöny, 106(EN1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.59258/hk.24061
  32. [32] Abbas, R. (2025). Arbitration, treaty stability, and the indus waters regime: A legal defence of continuity in transboundary water governance. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies, 3(1), 3969–3979. https://thecrsss.com/index.php/Journal/article/download/1461/1421
  33. [33] Khanom, S. (2026). Transboundary Rivers of South Asia: Interplay between Dispute and Diplomatic Deadlock under Climate Change Conditions. In Rivers Beyond Borders (pp. 135–149). CRC Press. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781003599692-7/transboundary-rivers-south-asia-sufia-khanom
  34. [34] Khajavigodellou, Y., Moran, E. F., Qi, J., & Chen, J. (2026). Nexus-diplomacy integration in transboundary river water governance: A systematic review. Water, 18(9), 1034. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/18/9/1034
  35. [35] Abacha, M. (2025). Innovative Approaches to Sustainable Peace and Stability in the Age of Global Conflict. GAS Journal of Education and Literature (GASJEL), 2(9), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.175107477
  36. [36] Manhas, N. S., & Donnellon-May, G. (2026). Riparian neighbours: Exploring India-China water disputes and pathways to resolution. In Rivers beyond borders (pp. 45–69). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003599692-3
  37. [37] Messenger, G. (2024). Mitigating the rise of unilateralism: lessons from forestry management. Journal of International Economic Law, 27(2), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgae018
  38. [38] Kapesa, T. (2025). Collaboration and partnerships: fostering regional cooperation for sustainable development. Sustainable Development in Southern Africa (pp. 239–261). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003596011-11
  39. [39] Khatoon, S., Awan, A. U. H., Iqbal, Z., & Bibi, M. (2025). Climate Change Diplomacy and the Role of Pakistan in Global Environmental Negotiations. Social Sciences Spectrum, 4(2), 774–792. https://doi.org/10.71085/sss.04.02.350
  40. [40] Sharma, N. (2025). India’s strategic role in SAARC: Challenges and opportunities in regional cooperation. Spanish Journal of Innovation and Integrity, 41, 281–287. https://www.sjii.es/index.php/journal/article/view/459
  41. [41] Thakur, D. J., Chitra, G., Seenivasan, R., Ponnapalli, H., Durga, K., Selvakumar, P., & Manjunath, T. C. (2026). Data sharing and climate monitoring between neighboring territories. Cross-Border Cooperation in the Age of Climate Change (pp. 209–236). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-3972-6.ch008

Downloads

Published

2026-09-13

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): Innovations in Environmental Economics

Section

Articles

Categories

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Innovations in Environmental Economics

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Climate Diplomacy as a Foreign Policy Tool: Pakistan’s Role in Regional Water Politics and Transboundary Environmental Governance. (2026). Innovations in Environmental Economics , 2(3), 223-237. https://doi.org/10.48313/iee.vi.74

Similar Articles

1-10 of 35

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.