Extending the Solow Growth Paradigm in Pakistan: The Dynamic Role of Digitalization, Green Investment, and Institutional Quality in Sustainable Economic Growth

Authors

https://doi.org/10.48313/iee.v1i4.67

Abstract

Digitalization, environmental transformation, institutional governance, and global integration increasingly shape economic growth in developing economies. This study examines the effects of digital capital, green investment, human and physical capital, Institutional Quality (IQ), and Trade Openness (TO) on Pakistan’s economic growth from 2000 to 2024. Grounded in the extended Solow Growth Model, which incorporates digital transformation, environmental investment, and institutional performance alongside traditional growth factors, the study employs the ARDL bounds testing approach and an error-correction model to analyze long-run and short-run dynamics. The long-run ARDL results reveal that TO, digital capital, green investment, and physical capital exert significant negative effects on growth, whereas IQ positively influences growth, and human capital shows a weak positive effect. In the short run, lagged digital capital, IQ, TO, and lagged physical capital significantly enhance growth, while green investment and human capital remain insignificant. The strongly negative and significant ECM coefficient confirms rapid adjustment toward the long-run equilibrium. Granger causality findings further indicate that digital capital, green investment, physical capital, and TO cause economic growth unidirectionally. Overall, the findings highlight the critical roles of IQ, digital readiness, and external sector dynamics in shaping Pakistan’s growth trajectory, emphasizing the need for efficient capital allocation, stronger export competitiveness, and better integration of green and digital investments into productive sectors.

Keywords:

Institutional quality, Green investment, Digital capital, Economic growth, Granger causality, ARDL, Pakistan

References

  1. [1] Lin, J. Y., & Fu, C. (2024). Transformation and upgrading of economic structure is the key to development. Demystifying the world economic development (pp. 71–132). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5632-2_3
  2. [2] Vlados, C., & Chatzinikolaou, D. (2024). The emergence of the new globalization: The approach of the evolutionary structural triptych. Journal of global responsibility, 16(1), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-04-2023-0063
  3. [3] Chen, Z., & Xing, R. (2025). Digital economy, green innovation and high-quality economic development. International review of economics & finance, 99, 104029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104029
  4. [4] Michaelides, P. G. (2024). The solow growth model. 21 equations that shaped the world economy: understanding the theory behind the equations (pp. 185–197). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76140-9_16
  5. [5] Cook, S., & Rani, U. (2025). Platform work in developing economies: Can digitalisation drive structural transformation? The Indian journal of labour economics, 68(2), 395–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-024-00541-1
  6. [6] Wang, Z., & Wu, H. (2025). Research on the influence mechanism of digital economy based on neural networks on corporate governance model. Journal of the knowledge economy, 16(2), 10104–10135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02287-z
  7. [7] Kemal, A. A., & Shah, M. H. (2023). Digital innovation in social cash organizations – the effects of the institutional interactions for transforming organizational practices. Information technology & people, 37(5), 2092–2126. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-02-2023-0176
  8. [8] Maghyereh, A., Boulanouar, Z., & Essid, L. (2025). The dynamics of green innovation and environmental policy stringency in energy transition investments. Journal of cleaner production, 487, 144649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144649
  9. [9] Zhou, B., Wu, W., Dong, S., Zhang, X., & Li, J. (2024). Sustainable integration of mineral resources, low carbon transition, and economic resilience in China. Resources policy, 98, 105336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105336
  10. [10] Yang, C., Qi, H., Jia, L., Wang, Y., & Huang, D. (2024). Impact of digital technologies and financial development on green growth: Role of mineral resources, institutional quality, and human development in South Asia. Resources policy, 90, 104699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104699
  11. [11] Li, X., & Tong, X. (2024). Fostering green growth in Asian developing economies: The role of good governance in mitigating the resource curse. Resources policy, 90, 104724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104724
  12. [12] Behera, B., Haldar, A., & Sethi, N. (2024). Investigating the direct and indirect effects of Information and Communication Technology on economic growth in the emerging economies: Role of financial development, foreign direct investment, innovation, and institutional quality. Information technology for development, 30(1), 33–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2023.2233463
  13. [13] Gao, J., Hua, G., & Huo, B. (2025). Digital technology, green innovation, and high-quality economic development: mechanism analysis and empirical evidence. Journal of the knowledge economy, 16(3), 12011–12047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02355-4
  14. [14] Ali, N., Butzbach, O. K., Katohar, H. A., & Afridi, H. I. (2024). Structural and external barriers to pakistan’s economic growth: Pathways to sustainable development. World, 5(4), 1120–1129. https://doi.org/10.3390/world5040056
  15. [15] Michailidis, M., Zafeiriou, E., Kantartzis, A., Galatsidas, S., & Arabatzis, G. (2025). Governance, energy policy, and sustainable development: Renewable energy infrastructure transition in developing MENA countries. Energies, 18(11), 2759. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18112759
  16. [16] Sohail, H. M., Ullah, M., Tang, C., & Moudud-Ul-Huq, S. (2025). Role of ICT in achieving pakistan sustainable development goals. Fudan journal of the humanities and social sciences, 18(4), 803–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-024-00436-x
  17. [17] Deng, X., Bakhsh, S., Ali, K., & Anas, M. (2025). How does green investment, financial inclusion, and digitalization drive environmental sustainability in China? A perspective based on quantile-on-quantile regression and wavelet coherence analysis. Environment, development and sustainability, 27(12), 29743–29774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04894-x
  18. [18] Githui, F. K., & Njuru, J. W. (2024). The role of public management in the achievement of sustainable development goals. International journal of science and business, 31(1), 64–75. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/118222486
  19. [19] García-Vidal, G., Loredo-Carballo, N. A., Pérez-Campdesuñer, R., & García-Vidal, G. (2025). Economic convergence analyses in perspective: A bibliometric mapping and its strategic implications (1982–2025). Economies, 13(10), 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13100289
  20. [20] Allam, Z., & Cheshmehzangi, A. (2024). Technological innovation and sustainable transitions. Sustainable futures and green new deals (pp. 55–79). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63642-4_3
  21. [21] Jameel, S., Rasheed, B., & Shaikh, P. A. (2025). Impact of institutional quality on the economic growth of pakistan. Policy research journal (PRJ), 3(1), 1–11. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Balach-Rasheed/publication/388045142
  22. [22] Qingran, G., Razi, U., Ramzan, M., Cuicui, D., & Vasa, L. (2025). Digital economy and export complexity: Unveiling its role in transforming china’s manufacturing industry. Environment, development and sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-06742-y
  23. [23] Noah, A., & David, O. (2025). Does ICT adoption moderate the impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth in Africa? Administrative sciences, 15(3), 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15030088
  24. [24] Hossain, M. B., Rahman, M. U., Čater, T., & Vasa, L. (2024). Determinants of SMEs’ strategic entrepreneurial innovative digitalization: Examining the mediation role of human capital. European journal of innovation management, 28(7), 2733–2760. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2024-0176
  25. [25] Zervas, I., & Stiakakis, E. (2024). Economic sustainable development through digital skills acquisition: the role of human resource leadership. Sustainability, 16(17), 7664. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177664
  26. [26] Song, C., Wu, Z., Dong, R. K., & Dinçer, H. (2023). Greening south Asia: Investing in sustainability and innovation to preserve natural resources and combat environmental pollution. Resources policy, 86, 104239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104239
  27. [27] Hung, N. T. (2023). Green investment, financial development, digitalization and economic sustainability in Vietnam: Evidence from a quantile-on-quantile regression and wavelet coherence. Technological forecasting and social change, 186, 122185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122185
  28. [28] Muhammad Irfan, Adnan Ahmad, & Syed Mohsin Ali Shah. (2025). Bridging institutional gaps: social entrepreneurship and sustainable development in Pakistan. Journal of management science research review, 4(3), 1483–1520. https://jmsrr.com/index.php/Journal/article/view/153
  29. [29] Judson, R. (2002). Measuring human capital like physical capital: What does it tell us? bulletin of economic research, 54(3), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8586.00150
  30. [30] Teles, V. K. (2005). The role of human capital in economic growth. Applied economics letters, 12(9), 583–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850500077013
  31. [31] Dinda, S. (2008). Social capital in the creation of human capital and economic growth: A productive consumption approach. The journal of socio-economics, 37(5), 2020–2033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2007.06.014
  32. [32] Ockwell, D. G. (2008). Energy and economic growth: Grounding our understanding in physical reality. Energy Policy, 36(12), 4600–4604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.005
  33. [33] Dias, J., & Tebaldi, E. (2012). Institutions, human capital, and growth: The institutional mechanism. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(3), 300–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2012.04.003
  34. [34] Saha, S., & Das, P. (2023). Contribution of human and physical capital to the economic growth in india: post-reform scenario. Public policies and sustainable development in post-reform India: Regional responses and the way forward (pp. 267–300). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3696-0_15
  35. [35] Berkhout, F., & Hertin, J. (2004). De-materialising and re-materialising: Digital technologies and the environment. Futures, 36(8), 903–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2004.01.003
  36. [36] Fuchs, C. (2008). The implications of new information and communication technologies for sustainability. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-006-9065-0
  37. [37] Shirazi, F., Gholami, R., & Añón Higón, D. (2009). The impact of information and communication technology (ICT), education and regulation on economic freedom in Islamic Middle Eastern countries. Information & Management, 46(8), 426–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2009.08.003
  38. [38] Nizam, H. A., Zaman, K., Khan, K. B., Batool, R., Khurshid, M. A., Shoukry, A. M., …, & Gani, S. (2020). Achieving environmental sustainability through information technology: “Digital Pakistan” initiative for green development. Environmental science and pollution research, 27(9), 10011–10026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07683-x
  39. [39] Ren, S., Li, L., Han, Y., Hao, Y., & Wu, H. (2022). The emerging driving force of inclusive green growth: Does digital economy agglomeration work? Business Strategy and the environment, 31(4), 1656–1678. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2975
  40. [40] Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of economic growth, 9(2), 131–165. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEG.0000031425.72248.85
  41. [41] Tabellini, G. (2005). The role of the state in economic development. Kyklos, 58(2), 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-5962.2005.00289.x
  42. [42] Law, S. H., & Azman-Saini, W. N. W. (2012). Institutional quality, governance, and financial development. Economics of Governance, 13(3), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-012-0112-z
  43. [43] Giri, A. K., & Mohapatra, G. (2022). Do institutional quality and trade openness influence economic growth? an empirical evidence from India. Studies in International Economics and Finance: Essays in Honour of Prof. Bandi Kamaiah (pp. 165–182). Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7062-6_9
  44. [44] Chhabra, M., Giri, A. K., & Kumar, A. (2023). What shapes economic growth in BRICS? Exploring the role of institutional quality and trade openness. Economic papers: A journal of applied economics and policy, 42(4), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-3441.12378
  45. [45] Humayun, T., Li, S., Niazi, G. R., Humayun, S., & Younas, W. (2025). An empirical analysis of Pakistan’s economic growth from the perspective of strong sustainability. Natural resources forum, 49(1), 244–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12369
  46. [46] Ullah, S., Ozturk, I., Majeed, M. T., & Ahmad, W. (2021). Do technological innovations have symmetric or asymmetric effects on environmental quality? Evidence from Pakistan. Journal of cleaner production, 316, 128239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128239
  47. [47] Wang, J., Yang, J., & Yang, L. (2023). Do natural resources play a role in economic development? Role of institutional quality, trade openness, and FDI. Resources Policy, 81, 103294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103294
  48. [48] Myovella, G., Karacuka, M., & Haucap, J. (2020). Digitalization and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa and OECD economies. Telecommunications policy, 44(2), 101856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101856
  49. [49] World Bank. (2022). World development report 2022. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2022
  50. [50] World Bank. (2024). World Development indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators

Downloads

Published

2025-12-26

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): Innovations in Environmental Economics

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Extending the Solow Growth Paradigm in Pakistan: The Dynamic Role of Digitalization, Green Investment, and Institutional Quality in Sustainable Economic Growth. (2025). Innovations in Environmental Economics , 1(4), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.48313/iee.v1i4.67

Similar Articles

1-10 of 27

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.